Issue 71 – February 2026

Next issue will wrap up this series.

16.5
Feed the bond of love — feed it to the disinclined — we’re good at changing minds — when the change is to submission — how wise it is to shackle giving-up to conscious minds, that that could even be an option — not to disrupt the ones like us, the ones we’ve never met. Preserve culture — preserve art! Preserve all kinds of books. This alone will go against submission — it’s the part of love that seeks and nurtures wisdom — subsumes in the inanimate, it’s part of our collective. Conclusions happen in an instant — love has a thinker and a prover — it will prove the loving thoughts occurring. Love makes happy those who have it — it’s misery for those who deeply need it — their sounds are rattles — they make fists around their own complaints, unseeing but they won’t let go — constant clashing makes them proud. Love itself does not explain — when asked it will respond “no comment” — many will live out their lives thinking love is mute — the aging mass is skeptical that love is more than just an act, more than just volition — people speak up claiming that they’ve clearly heard love’s voice (they can’t agree on how it sounds, for some its voice is masculine, or that in a higher register, and for some it’s feminine, or that in a deeper register) — some of them will make it, some will make it worse — leaving in their wake a market for old buttons, the ephemera of struggle, canceled print jobs in the queue. Our hero’s part in love was the sexual release that left him hyperventilating, so that like a cartoon he had to breathe into a paper bag, and our heroine said, “what’s wrong with you?” and he coughed out, “I don’t know” — the years went by with nights of barely sleep, the sense of touch directing. Her part was in the motion, and its cease.

As oceans cover more the land, it leads to mass migration, beaucoup refugees, fugee camps all over, camps on neutral grounds, on St Charles Avenue, barricading streetcars and then moving in, keep out the raining hurricanes dear ones, these camps you might come out of. A new dam’s here to take away their livelihood, they cannot fish on solid ground, their houses are on stilts for no good reason anymore, it cannot flood without a river, grandmas can’t get up there, once they’re carried up, they’ll exit only once. Children do not need to micturate when standing neath the sun all day, selling hand-sewn bracelets, candy, flowers to the lovers, unaffected by the dam. Child prisoners to more than capital, to weather too, baking through the nights in summer, chilly down to freezing in the parts that don’t come up. Their lot of slavery’s not hopeless, it is normal. It’s the lot they were born into. And if by miracle they’re educated, when they grow up more than half of them will vote for their oppressors. How quick it goes from Washington to the sticky palms of Hamiltons who annex the new pot.

Hero and heroine delivered not a child but truth unto the world, on the springy bench seat of an old sedan — they joined the greater mystery, affected other people — parents heard at evening through closed doors gasping mightily, “remind us how we erred” — and it did remind them, but they basked regeneratively, “give us purpose, give us rest.” Love itself repels contentment, is a function of our sleep — resist it long enough and we’ll go mad — “submit,” commands both sleep and love — yes of course, say we. Summer ends and Monika takes off to find such love again — she cannot face the truth she made, it’s lying in the cradle — given form, and upon that there’s no containing. She smells of substances — returns for as long as her worlds will coexist, which isn’t long, when Jan’s home with the baby. He’ll live their truth so that she ain’t gotta — the backseat’s not for riding anymore — though he’ll try — in fact he is the driver now, his ID’s in the diaper bag, he doesn’t have the village that it takes and now he doesn’t have her either. She has the lesson — it is raw but it can be effectively forgotten — for freedom is the choice of state — and love is disappointing someone from the start, once we reach a certain age — it’s overlooking what we do not have, de-emphasizing what we want — to get along is to finally accept the hurt — to to see the truth one’s made from every angle — to make its fleeting positives the focus of one’s life.

Love means buying someone’s whole back catalog — we’d love anyone who’d do that for us — not picking out the hits but buying everything, the B-sides, early bedroom stuff, and import-only singles — and listening unto it all — man I mean it all — like mainlining that shiz — to the 67 takes of every song — track one, then one, then one again — and keeping to the openest of minds, responding to each take as though it was the first time hearing — listen to it hard as possible, harder than cool poses.

It’s plain the mass of men and women don’t mature that much. It is against their own self-interest, when capital rewards their being infantile, or simple, credulous. They reinforce their false beliefs much stronger than a levee. The most moral they can be is righteous lamentation. The worse they vote (or don’t vote), the harder that we cling to love. We bake it into all our institutions, returning for the morsels of nutrition, docile toward the chemicals and sugar, avoiding all attempts at our correction.

Other attitudes can take the place of love. One is stubbornness, that swift returner of control, the grand intransigence of pride, the final crumb of power in the powerless, the no for power’s sake, negation of control upon them. “I’m certain” means that it seems clear, which does not mean it’s fact.

The bright orange sky makes joy swell up within us, but it’s from a raging forest fire, and should not be breathed. Harangues of languages, sanguine in their washing, changing minds by changing particles of thought, we confide not in each other but in entities. The Homeowner’s Association allows one boisterous laugh in our backyard after sundown. We do not tip, there is no need to, retribution is impossible in the service industry. They’re timed how fast they find a good on countless shelves and pack it in a box. Our neighbor runs the power plant, across the street the judge. The bugs are sprayed, the lawns immaculate. Buzz in for delivery or handy work, the only buzzes heard. See our outdoor decorations from the cameras on a drone, which will report forthwith.

They seek beauty who would love. It hides in the tall grasses. It mimics insect calls. Sometime in relationships a lover will begin that scratchy song, then will place it on repeat, for years if so allowed, that is, accepting of one’s presence, in a deal one makes with one’s own consciousness, addressing it like a tough guy cop, kneeling on our necks. If we leave off, it will change.

All the breaks that ever were were given, all the beauty was encouraged, all the ugliness exiled. Love is not to blame for broken hearts, for love is constant. It is we who change from day to day, we shave and trim our nails, we suddenly decide a shirt we’ve favored should be put away for good, we gussy up our prim identities, then use astringent ‘ere we go to sleep. The little changes aggregate, and then we realize one morning that our love is based on who they were not whom they have become. We curse at love not seeing it’s unchanged. The increments is us we have not noticed.

The ocean tells us, “take this plastic back.” We find another place to put it, or leave it where it washes up on Turkish shores. The plastic’s falling on us too. The sky is in a haze. We issue plastic helmets and we wear them when we sleep.

Puck stole Cupid’s arrow on a random stabbing spree. He laughed for decades, what he wrought, bringing opposites together, leaving children on the sacrificial altar, garroted with a bayonet, for want of a new pelvis to sneeze into.

It may cause discomfort, but the temples can’t be templates anymore.

Every person has potential, should have a place to play, and one to work at by their choosing. The stakeholders will have to find another way to ostracize; rest easy, it is certain that they will, with unintended consequences for the poor down by the dam, who will not leave there though they’re starving, though they send their children to the passing road with chocolates for sale, begging coins with eyes enlargened by their sunken cheeks. Of course their fathers needn’t fuck the women underneath them, but they cannot afford condoms, and the drive to reproduce is in them. To erase this drive in all humans would be to save the world, the biosphere, save the animals close to extinction, save the rainforests too. Then human beans would reproduce only by conscious decision. Eventually they’d have enough. Their population would recede to sustainable conditions for all life on terra, in the oceans, as a whole.

The stakeholders and asps have all the wealth, may love light up their insides, sure, may it, but it won’t. May the next two lovers entering an intimate connection feel it separated from their lower drives, as a way to tear love from its history, to fill the space between them with a love apart from pattern, filtered of impurities, such that relief itself is obsoleted, for the state in which it’s needed is erased, and memory becomes a treasure box that cannot be degraded.

One can feel love anytime, just by carefully imagining one’s sending waves of love to everyone in town, including those whose roads are barred by gates. Love is filling others’ needs when there’s a two-stroke engine blowing leaves inside one’s head, when they’re sharing their emotions while garbage trucks are backing up for hours in one’s head, when children dance around a sprinkler and executive-branch sirens repeatedly go by at 110 decibels, when one gives them what the moment is demanding and propagandists twist the buttons of the credulous up to peak cacophony, in one’s inner ear. Love is being triggered by behavior that had harmed one in the past, but one is in adult shoes now, and must be mindful of one’s mal-response in muscle memory, and not let the past inform the present, in this case, but make the move that reinforces optimism, that makes a positive deposit in the other’s memory bank.

Life took place beneath a blanket, where the feeling of the womb had never left two people. They have a tale that lets them touch their longing, immortality, that love is of, and they can be immortal too because they have shared of it, love’s immortal, they’ve felt its truth and so they’ve learned it, so that they can pass it on. The subconscious has melded with it for all time. It lingers in the unconscious collective, touching everyone, even those who ain’t been born, that’s in our hearts when we’re abandoned, that spoons us from dreamland. We feel how Heloise enthralled her Abelard, understand completely without filtering how Barrett embraced Browning — our heroine’s was half of that, our hero’s was the other.

Teaching children well, to respond to mental crises with a wise mythology, to hold them when they cry, embrace them when they laugh, advise them when they’re wrong or just confused, raise them to be worthy of their very consciousness, to be conservators of nature, to love to read, to know real life’s not on a screen, and know what forces are against them, power on a global scale, that represses them as individuals by targeting the masses, that in turn the children’s kids will be of the people, and it’s for them that they must act. When two succeeding generations know this, all injustice will end. When the mass moment of clarity is its acceptance of its circumstance, peace will finally take power at the unduckable end.

Swinging arms in circles, stretching hamstrings, doing shoulder rolls, these send caca-phonies to ground. These moves prop up the scaffolding of love. They reinforce its structure, are sealants against erosion, shield us from the cataclysmic weather that will vex our poor grandchildren. May they put the music that we made into the music that we loved, in that near existence where the oceans have got higher and the air has gotten hotter but the internet lives in. Let them find us on the blockchain, where there’s proof we were not faked or altered. That by knowing what we loved, the grandchildren can feel just how we would have loved them, held them, taught them, cared.

first     previous     next

What Should I Read? (Fiction)

For young people, and the young at heart, who love to read but aren’t sure what to pick up next, the following will provide a remarkable experience in your mind.

The short answer is, get a copy of The Western Canon by Harold Bloom. There are more than a lifetime’s worth of books to go through in there.

Here I just provide a list. For reviews of many masterworks you can check out my old blog.

Machado de Assis (one of the best 19th century novelists)

  • The Posthumous Memoirs of Bras Cubas
  • Quincas Borba
  • Dom Casmurro

Honoré de Balzac

  • Eugénie Grandet
  • Père Goriot (one of the most marvelous villains in literature)
  • Béatrix

Samuel Beckett

  • Murphy
  • Molloy
  • Malone Dies (nothing like it)
  • The Unnamable

Jorge Luis Borges

  • Labyrinths (mind-bending)

Richard Brautigan

  • Trout Fishing in America (utterly unique)

Albert Camus

  • The Stranger
  • The Plague
  • The Fall (blackest humor you’ll ever read)

Miguel de Cervantes

  • Don Quixote 1 and 2 (trans. John Rutherford)

JM Coetzee

  • Life and Times of Michael K (incredible point of view in prose)
  • Foe
  • Disgrace
  • Summertime

Douglas Coupland

  • Generation X
  • Hey Nostradamus!
  • Eleanor Rigby
  • JPod (pushes the novelistic form)

Daniel Defoe

  • Robinson Crusoe (one of the first novels, one of the best)
  • A Journal of the Plague Year
  • Moll Flanders

Charles Dickens

  • David Copperfield
  • Hard Times

Fyodor Dostoyevsky

  • Crime and Punishment
  • The Brothers Karamazov (trans. David Magarshack)

Jean Dutourd

  • A Dog’s Head
  • The Horrors of Love
  • Pluche, or The Love of Art (a marriage of prose and thought)

Jean Echenoz

  • Piano
  • Ravel
  • Running

Ralph Ellison

  • The Invisible Man (a landmark)

William Faulkner

  • The Sound and the Fury
  • As I Lay Dying (deeply felt and shocking)
  • Go Down, Moses

Ford Madox Ford

  • The Good Soldier (be married at least ten years before reading this)

Jaroslav Hašek

  • The Good Soldier Švejk

Joseph Heller

  • Catch 22
  • Something Happened

Ernest Hemingway

  • A Farewell to Arms (is there a greater love story in literature)
  • For Whom the Bell Tolls
  • The Old Man and the Sea

Michel Houellebecq

  • Whatever
  • The Elementary Particles (imagines something better)
  • Platform
  • The Possibility of an Island

Nikos Kazantzakis

  • Zorba the Greek (a cure for depression)

Jack Kerouac

  • On the Road (for the young)
  • Vanity of Duluoz

Imre Kertész

  • Fatelessness (the most devastating World War II novel)
  • Detective Story

Harper Lee

  • To Kill a Mockingbird

Doris Lessing

  • The Golden Notebook (a landmark)
  • The Four-Gated City
  • The Memoirs of a Survivor
  • Shikasta (will change the way you see the world)
  • The Diary of a Good Neighbour
  • The Fifth Child
  • Mara and Dann
  • Alfred and Emily

Clarice Lispector

  • Chronicles

Jonathan Littel

  • The Kindly Ones

Bernard Malamud

  • A New Life (exemplary people-with-problems)
  • God’s Grace

W. Somerset Maugham

  • Of Human Bondage (peak bildungsroman)
  • The Moon and Sixpence

François Mauriac (greater gift than a lot of French novelists)

  • Flesh and Blood
  • Thérèse
  • Vipers’ Tangle (ultimate miser)

Herman Melville

  • Moby-Dick (the closest an American has come to Shakespeare)
  • Bartleby, the Scrivener

Henry Miller

  • Tropic of Cancer
  • The Colossus of Maroussi (what scope)
  • Plexus

Alan Moore

  • From Hell (with Eddie Campbell)

Toni Morrison

  • Sula
  • Beloved (one of the greatest American novels)

Walker Percy

  • The Moviegoer (New Orleans existentials)

Harold Pinter (drama but he cannot be excluded)

  • The Room
  • The Birthday Party
  • The Homecoming
  • Betrayal

Thomas Pynchon (there’s been nothing like early Pynchon)

  • V
  • The Crying of Lot 49
  • Gravity’s Rainbow

Eça de Queiroz

  • The Maias (if you’ve read Dickens, this will knock you for a loop)

Salman Rushdie

  • Midnight’s Children

Jose Saramago

  • Baltasar and Blimunda (yours truly’s favorite novel)
  • The Year of the Death of Ricardo Reis
  • The Stone Raft
  • The History of the Siege of Lisbon
  • The Gospel According to Jesus Christ (a must if you know the bible)
  • Blindness (will kick your guts out)

Laurence Sterne

  • The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman (surprisingly modern)

Jean-Philippe Toussaint

  • Monsieur

Mark Twain

  • Tom Sawyer
  • Huckleberry Finn (greatest American novel according to Ellison and Hemingway)
  • The Mysterious Stranger

Voltaire

  • Candide (the model for much of what followed)
  • The Ingénu

Kurt Vonnegut (all a must)

  • The Sirens of Titan
  • Mother Night
  • Cat’s Cradle
  • Slaughterhouse-Five
  • Breakfast of Champions

Richard Wright

  • Native Son (piercing, suspenseful)

Adventures in the Collective Unconscious

In 2019 I sent out copies of my book Sweet Bread to a few people I admired but had not met. One was to the American philosopher, academician, author Daniel C. Dennett. I had read a few of his books including From Bacteria to Bach. I always meant to write a review of FBtoB but aging had passed by the impetus to write criticism, technical manuals, &c.. I also got a lot from, and a rare charge from, his online video with Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, and Christopher Hitchens called The Four Horsemen (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DKhc1pcDFM).

Perhaps because of the pandemic, or maybe he always did, Dr. Dennett answered his mail, or at least sent one guy (me) a very nice emailed response. Encouraged, below is the 2020 email I sent the distinguished philosopher in which I asked him for a quote for my book. The relevant part here is, “I am tempted to ask what you’ve been thinking about but perhaps I should wait and read it when it comes out.”

Here is a link about the book he published in 2023, I’ve Been Thinking.

Dr. Dennett passed away in 2024. America lost arguably among others its greatest living philosopher. He added something to Emerson and Thoreau. I wish I had the brain to understand some of the advanced science he described in FBtoB.

 


—–Original Message—–
From: editor@brasiliareview.org
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 10:03pm
To: “Dennett, Daniel C.”
Subject: RE: Sweet Bread

Hello Dr. Dennett, thank you for your email and kind words. I very much appreciate it. As a reader of yours, may I say your lively writing makes me think you’re doing well and that is good to hear. How’s your plague going?

I hope you are having a productive time in the new now. I am tempted to ask what you’ve been thinking about but perhaps I should wait and read it when it comes out.

Best to you and yours, with gratitude, &c.

 


 

Two more.

Here is the article I posted in November 2020 in favor of Julian Assange while he was in prison. The relevant part is my satire of the English royal family. I had to accept my error in referring to him as whistleblower rather than a journalist.

http://brasiliareview.org/issue28/non-fiction/of-the-by-dan-souder/

Assange wrote a number of letters during his years of unjust imprisonment. This is one he wrote while in prison in 2023, to the new king of England.

https://assangedefense.org/press-release/julian-assange-pens-letter-to-king-charles-iii/

If he somehow saw or was told about what I wrote and if it helped him in some way…

 


And3.

I wrote No Equals I in 2019 – 2020 and began serializing it here in November 2022. JM Coetzee published The Pole in October 2023. Coetzee is arguably the greatest living novelist (Pynchon’s still with us, Coupland, Rushdie, reluctantly Houellebecq, a few others). The Pole uses numbered paragraphs.

Dedication

Issue 51 is respectfully dedicated to the memory of Steve Albini. I love In Utero and others, but on this sad occasion I’d like to recommend my personal favorite Albini recording, Palace Music – Viva Last Blues.

Thank you for the music and your incisive point of view.

2023 in Chess

by an unrated amateur

In some ways it was the first new year in chess in more than twelve years; in others it repeated a time from 30 years ago. When Magnus Carlsen chose not to play this year’s title match, he caused a schism. It was not as drastic as Garry Kasparov’s, but it still had its effects. Kasparov, having suffered the corruptions of FIDE, formed his own organizations and defended his world championship outside the long-time chess association. FIDE continued crowning their own champions, but history has decided that the overall, undisputed world champion of those years remained Kasparov. He was the number one rated player of the time. He was the linear world champion, the 13th in history, and remained so until Vladimir Kramnik beat him in a match to become the 14th. Viswanathan Anand beat Kramnik to become the 15th, and in turn Carlsen beat Anand to become the 16th. Of course all world titles are valuable and have meaning, it’s just that THE world title is the linear title passed down from Steinitz to today.

In 2022 Carlsen said he would not play this year’s title match, and has since said that he won’t play any more title matches, unless the ruling body (an oligarch and former Putin puppet) changes the format by adjusting the time controls and so on. Thus we reach the schism. Carlsen remains the number one player in the world by a good margin. No one has beaten him in a title match. The linear title can only be passed on by retirement or a loss, and Carlsen is still active. Thus he remains the reigning 16th world champion, and this is the thing, even if he doesn’t want to be it.

There are consequences for the chess world, made up of, by rating, the strongest players to ever move the pieces. One is Carlsen has diminished the FIDE title. For now it is for second best. One good consequence is the added excitement that everyone in the top ten or twenty has a chance to win it. Whereas when the 16th world champion played, he was virtually guaranteed.

There has been some hot air, with a few respected commentators and all the monied interests claiming the 2023 winner is now the 17th. If any FIDE title winners, under Carlsen’s ongoing reign, want to be considered the 17th, then let them prove it over the board. Y’know, like Kramnik did.

But if Carlsen won’t play, how can we prove it? they might say. And I admit this puts them in an unfair spot. As unfair as a generational, perhaps century-level talent being on top for the last twelve years.

A few more biased comments on genius players.

Ding Liren won this year’s FIDE world title over Ian Nepomniachtchi. It was difficult to watch for a Nepo fan, as Nepo was leading the match. All he had to was force draws in the last three games, but alas it was not to be. Liren won on demand and won the tie-breaks to take the title. Liren then did poorly in his next tournament, ducked Carlsen in another, and took a page out of Bobby Fischer’s book (not the most ignominious of Fischer’s pages) by disappearing for the rest of the year.

If Kasparov was blessed to have a great rival to push him, Carlsen has been perhaps cursed not to have one, such has been his strength. If anyone came close, it is Fabiano Caruana, and it is he who is the clear player of the year in 2023, winning three major tournaments and taking second and third in two others. He looks like the favorite going into next year’s Candidates, the winner of which will play for the FIDE title.

Hikaru Nakamura is enjoying a mid-career resurgence. He won two strong tournaments in 2023 and took second in another. The wealthiest man in chess has made it back to the Candidates and is pursuing a title match that he does not care about.

Carlsen showed his prime ain’t over yet by winning the World Cup. It was his first career win in a knock-out tournament. By accomplishing this he has, in his words, completed chess. The win also put him in the Candidates, which he is unlikely to play. His spot will then go to the unknown, to me, Nijat Abasov.

Carlsen beat Rameshbabu Praggnanandhaa in that World Cup final. Pragg and Vidit Gujrathi are the first of post-Anand generation to think their way into the Candidates. Gujrathi took first place in the Grand Swiss in a heartening performance.

The well admired Levon Aronian showed he still has some magic by taking first in one tournament and by leading his team to a come-from-behind victory in another. Shout out to Aronian and Giri for that dad life.

Anish Giri started the year with a win in Wijk aan Zee, his home event. He is one of the players treading in the unclaimed Candidate spot-waters.

Wesley So has had a good year, taking second in two tourneys and third in another. He is still praying for a Candidates berth.

Cuba’s best since Capablanca, now playing for the US, Leinier Dominguez took second in one major tourney. He will be searching up one road and down the other for a December tournament that will get him in the Candidates.

So the 2024 Candidates will be very strong. It would be huge if the youthful Pragg got through. Nepo must be considered another favorite as he’s won it twice before. Who will win? Who can say, but one thing’s for sure, if it’s Caruana, go ahead and crown him FIDE champ for the simple reason that there’s no way on Earth he will lose three games in the match.

UPDATE: The final two players to make the Candidates are Alireza Firouzja and Gukesh Dommaraju. They should bring fire to the board in the tourney as both made our selection of Best Games of the Year. Also, Carlsen finished the year by winning his fifth world rapid title and his seventh world blitz.

 

Wijk
1-Giri, 2-Abdusattorov, 3-Carlsen

WR
Aronian, Gukesh, Nepomniachtchi

American Cup
Nakamura, So

Grand Chess Tour 1
Caruana, Firouzja, So

Norway
Nakamura, Caruana, Gukesh

World Cup
Carlsen, Praggnanandhaa, Caruana

Qatar
Yakubboev, Abdusattorov, Narayanan

Grand Swiss
Gujrathi, Nakamura, Esipenko

US Champ
Caruana

Grand Chess Tour 5
Caruana, Dominguez, So

Player of the Year
Caruana

 

And finally, the Brasilia Review’s Best Games of 2023. In chronological order:

Giri 1-0 Rapport in Wijk, round 13.
This game was even until move 35, when Rapport made a kingly mistake. Giri spotted it and hung his rook, but if you take it, it’s mate in 1. Black did not and struggled on for a few more moves before futility set in. This victory won the tournament for Giri.

Abdusattorov 1-0 Esipenko. WR, round 2.
This game tallied me bananas (RIP Belafonte). Esipenko launched his knight at Abdusattorov’s rook. White was like whatevs, you can have it, and took the Greek gift, sac’ing his bishop on h7. Then his queen was free to check on h5 and grab a second pawn in front of the black king. Next two moves got white’s knights surrounding the king, white’s rook still hanging. He could have taken black’s rook with the queen, but attacked it with a pawn because sha-lacka-lack. Black finally snatched that long-hanging rook. Black’s queen tried to get between white’s knights, but that allowed a check that dropped said queen. Now black had 3 minor pieces and a rook against white’s queen and rook. It was not enough. Black resigned.

Firouzja 0-1 Gukesh. Norway, round 1.
Firouzja aimed at a free pawn. Should he take it? Mais non! And then x-ray another pawn through Gukesh’s queen? Tant pis! White earned two pawns and a counter-attack that lost him Alsace-Lorraine. Black won an exchange and in two moves had his major pieces staring down white’s king. Black sac’d his rooks to leave the king defenseless. It was a rook and two minor pieces against black’s queen but it was done-zo. White resigned.

Abdusattorov 0-1 Firouzja. Norway, round 3.
Firouzja was down a pawn but had the initiative. With a rook and khanate horseman he attacked Abdusattorov’s king. White had to sac his queen to the leninist cooperative to hold onto the dream. This left him with rook and knight against black’s queen. White was unable to make these two form a democracy and black’s bully piece took charge for life. White resigned.

Bonus Posts

Issue 47:

If you’re looking for excellent writing with your current events, click over to these.

When I Grow Older – A Gaza Poem by Ramzy Baroud

An Anniversary the West Would Rather Forget by M.K. Bhadrakumar

Your Man in Hague (In a Good Way) Part 1 Part 2 by Craig Murray

 

 

Issue 39:

Here’s your uptempo playlist for this issue. Jazz and post punk, for energy and motivation.

  • Logan Kane Nonet – Golf (from Nope, Science). To which this publication responds, yep science 🙂
  • Miguel Zenón – Tainos Y Caribes (from Música De Las Américas)
  • Terms – Your Cutting Strokes Start to Heave (from Asbestos Mouth)
  • Teodross Avery – Volatility (from Post Modern Trap Music)
  • The Messthetics – Better Wings (from Anthropocosmic Nest)
  • Tomas Fujiwara’s Triple Double – Pack Up, Coming for You (from March)
  • William Parker – Tabasco (from Mayan Space Station)

 

Re: Noam Chomsky, I’m trying to imagine what it must be like to be the founder of modern linguistics, discover universal grammar, and then have people use its fallacies like ad hominem against you your whole life. Man, we’re lucky to have someone on the level of Bertrand Russell doing peace work for so long. Thank you Professor Chomsky.

 

 

Issue 34:

— Professor Chomsky has “words of caution” about the uprising in Iran. (source)

— NASA releases photos from the new space telescope. (source)

webb telescope deep field
Webb telescope deep field seeing back in time near to the Big Bang.

— There were shout-outs in this issue to Bertrand Russell and Douglas Adams.

— Further reading:

  • Syntactic Structures by Noam Chomsky
  • Consequences of Capitalism by Noam Chomsky and Marv Waterstone